That Wikipedia article was interesting, especially about how many Asimov readers had the same inability to remember the story as Shel had, and how Asimov learned to handle the situation
That's an interesting observation by Ernie & Federico. Evidently ChatGPT is still prone to error.
Regarding its answer to your question about religion, I don't consider it politically correct at all. Its answer was in line with its purpose. It wasn't created to be a god or to be worshipped; it's a tool.
And while we're on the subject of Asimov (which is actually the reason I came here in the first place), his Three Laws of Robotics would seem to negate any god-like tendences of ChatGPT:
1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2. A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.
The Last Question is actually a short story by Issac Asimov. Published in 1956. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Last_Question
That Wikipedia article was interesting, especially about how many Asimov readers had the same inability to remember the story as Shel had, and how Asimov learned to handle the situation
The pain for me is that I was a huge fan of Asimov and still am.
If only I had opened this email earlier, I could’ve been first to post the information about “the last question.”
That's an interesting observation by Ernie & Federico. Evidently ChatGPT is still prone to error.
Regarding its answer to your question about religion, I don't consider it politically correct at all. Its answer was in line with its purpose. It wasn't created to be a god or to be worshipped; it's a tool.
And while we're on the subject of Asimov (which is actually the reason I came here in the first place), his Three Laws of Robotics would seem to negate any god-like tendences of ChatGPT:
1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2. A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.